The short comparison
Investigate the rare-earth chain.
A curated dataset of companies, facilities, output and disclosed relationships, with evidence, comparisons, saved investigations and assumption-based scenarios.
Published offering
S&P Capital IQ Pro's metals offering describes mining intelligence, asset evaluation and industry analysis. S&P also describes linking mining properties and production information with company financials and wider market research. Panjiva is a separate S&P trade-intelligence product.
Provider source ↗Is the unit of analysis a listed company or a material route?
An equity team may begin with financial statements, capital structure and valuation peers. A dependency investigation may begin with a separator whose output appears in several companies' supply chains. The two views can intersect without being interchangeable: a diversified company is not necessarily evidence of diversified material inputs.
Use an investment question to expose the difference. If a mining company announces a downstream agreement, can you determine what is contracted, which facility is involved and whether current production supports the claim? Financial context helps assess the issuer. Physical evidence helps assess the industrial proposition behind the issuer.
How the work differs
In Oreline, follow the company to its facilities, distinguish ownership from physical supply and inspect the agreement at the scope actually disclosed. Compare production observations and keep capacity targets separate. Save the inputs used for a scenario so the conclusion can be revisited.
Sources, reporting periods and evidence gaps remain visible throughout the investigation. Coverage is reviewed rather than exhaustive or live, and undisclosed quantities stay unknown. Read how the analysis handles them.
Why Oreline for this work
A company-level investment case needs a defensible view of its industrial execution. Oreline helps connect that case to facilities, product stages and dated disclosures in a working research base. Explore the sandbox to see how examining an agreement or output record can change the next diligence question.
Pricing and access
Oreline costs $1,000 USD per organisation per month, including 20 individual seats and access to the published research library, curated dataset and investigation tools. See the subscription details.
S&P Capital IQ Pro pricing is not quoted here. When comparing costs, account for the required modules, team access, data rights and contract term. Oreline's organisation plan includes the published research and working tools in one subscription.
Oreline’s free sandbox needs no account and contains selected examples. It is a product evaluation, not free access to the full subscription workspace.
What to test before buying
- Keep financial-data requirements separate from physical-network requirements.
- Test company-level disclosures against site-level evidence.
- Confirm the metals modules, data rights and user entitlements in the S&P package.
Frequently asked questions
Does Oreline replace Capital IQ financial data?
No. Oreline is not a financial-statements, valuation or transaction-data terminal.
Is Panjiva included in this comparison?
No. Panjiva is a separate S&P Global product with a trade-data use case. Product entitlements depend on the licence.
Sources and scope
Provider information checked on . Product descriptions are attributed to the provider; recommendations are Oreline’s assessment of workflow fit. An unmentioned feature is not evidence that the provider lacks it.
- S&P Capital IQ Pro Metals
- Oreline’s product, team and subscription scope
- Our comparison and corrections policy
Spotted a changed feature or an error? Send the relevant source to support@sirca.io.
Test the work, not just the description.
Follow a dependency, inspect production evidence and challenge a supplier assumption.
Explore Oreline →