The short comparison
Investigate the rare-earth chain.
A curated dataset of companies, facilities, output and disclosed relationships, with evidence, comparisons, saved investigations and assumption-based scenarios.
Published offering
Wood Mackenzie's Rare Earths Product Suite describes supply, demand and pricing analysis across multiple rare-earth elements, together with research and analyst access. Its scope is broader than treating all rare earths as one magnet-material market. Buyers should request the exact suite contents and coverage relevant to their decision.
Provider source ↗Is your question about the whole rare-earth market or a magnet supply route?
Rare-earth markets share extraction and processing infrastructure, but a total rare-earth figure is not equivalent to magnet-grade NdPr availability. An analyst comparing a supplier needs to keep the product distinction intact. A team planning across multiple end uses may instead need element-by-element demand and pricing research.
This matters when someone presents a large resource or a total oxide capacity as evidence of future magnet supply. The material mix, separation capability, downstream conversion and qualification still need attention. A broad research suite can be valuable precisely because it covers more markets, while a focused tool can be valuable because it makes one recurring investigation easier to perform.
How the work differs
In Oreline, start at the supply-chain stage that matters to the decision. Open production observations rather than relying on an asset's headline description. Compare product and period, then follow disclosed relationships into processing and manufacturing. Save the work with the distinctions still visible.
Sources, reporting periods and evidence gaps remain visible throughout the investigation. Coverage is reviewed rather than exhaustive or live, and undisclosed quantities stay unknown. Read how the analysis handles them.
Why Oreline for this work
When the decision concerns magnet supply, focus the investigation on the relevant product stages and operations. Oreline brings those records, their sources and analytical tools together so the team can review the chain rather than reconstruct it for every meeting. Explore the workflow in the sandbox.
Pricing and access
Oreline costs $1,000 USD per organisation per month, including 20 individual seats and access to the published research library, curated dataset and investigation tools. See the subscription details.
Wood Mackenzie pricing is not quoted here. When comparing costs, account for the required modules, team access, data rights and contract term. Oreline's organisation plan includes the published research and working tools in one subscription.
Oreline’s free sandbox needs no account and contains selected examples. It is a product evaluation, not free access to the full subscription workspace.
What to test before buying
- List the specific rare-earth elements and end uses your team researches.
- Check treatment of mixed products versus individual separated oxides.
- Ask which suite components and analyst services are included, rather than assuming all are bundled.
Frequently asked questions
Does Oreline cover every use of every rare-earth element?
Its current focus is the rare-earth permanent-magnet supply chain. Do not assume comprehensive coverage of catalysts, phosphors or other specialised end markets.
Should we compare subscriptions by facility count?
Not alone. Test the relevant production stage, product definition, evidence quality and workflow. A large collection can still be a poor fit for a particular research question.
Sources and scope
Provider information checked on . Product descriptions are attributed to the provider; recommendations are Oreline’s assessment of workflow fit. An unmentioned feature is not evidence that the provider lacks it.
- Wood Mackenzie Rare Earths Product Suite
- Oreline’s product, team and subscription scope
- Our comparison and corrections policy
Spotted a changed feature or an error? Send the relevant source to support@sirca.io.
Test the work, not just the description.
Follow a dependency, inspect production evidence and challenge a supplier assumption.
Explore Oreline →