The short comparison
Investigate the rare-earth chain.
A curated dataset of companies, facilities, output and disclosed relationships, with evidence, comparisons, saved investigations and assumption-based scenarios.
Published offering
Sayari Graph describes visualising ownership, trade and financial relationships together. Its public proposition supports supply-chain, compliance and procurement teams examining counterparties and their connections. That relationship intelligence is relevant to rare-earth research, but it is not the same question as what a facility produces.
Provider source ↗Are you tracing control, movement or production?
Ownership helps identify who controls an entity. Trade evidence helps identify movements and counterparties. A physical production chain requires evidence of transformation between materials and facilities. An analyst may need all three, but should not collapse them into one undifferentiated connection.
For example, finding a common parent behind two suppliers can change a diversification assessment even if their production sites differ. Finding a trade relationship does not automatically reveal a factory's input share. The right evaluation follows these claims separately and asks what evidence would justify the conclusion your team intends to make.
How the work differs
In Oreline, move from the company to its researched facilities, inspect ownership and follow reported physical routes. Review commercial agreements at their original scope. Compare product and output evidence before treating connected companies as interchangeable sources of the same material.
Sources, reporting periods and evidence gaps remain visible throughout the investigation. Coverage is reviewed rather than exhaustive or live, and undisclosed quantities stay unknown. Read how the analysis handles them.
Why Oreline for this work
Understanding who controls a company is one question; understanding the material route is another. Oreline helps your team connect the relevant industrial evidence without treating ownership as proof of physical flow. Follow an investigation in the sandbox to inspect both the relationship and its supporting source.
Pricing and access
Oreline costs $1,000 USD per organisation per month, including 20 individual seats and access to the published research library, curated dataset and investigation tools. See the subscription details.
Sayari pricing is not quoted here. When comparing costs, account for the required modules, team access, data rights and contract term. Oreline's organisation plan includes the published research and working tools in one subscription.
Oreline’s free sandbox needs no account and contains selected examples. It is a product evaluation, not free access to the full subscription workspace.
What to test before buying
- Distinguish legal ownership, trade and physical supply in the demo.
- Ask what evidence establishes the producing site and product.
- Keep compliance screening separate from a general supply-chain research conclusion.
Frequently asked questions
Can Oreline replace beneficial-ownership due diligence?
No. Its researched company context does not constitute comprehensive legal-entity due diligence or compliance clearance.
Does a common owner mean two factories are the same supply route?
No. Common control and shared physical dependency are different findings. Both may matter and should be examined separately.
Sources and scope
Provider information checked on . Product descriptions are attributed to the provider; recommendations are Oreline’s assessment of workflow fit. An unmentioned feature is not evidence that the provider lacks it.
Spotted a changed feature or an error? Send the relevant source to support@sirca.io.
Test the work, not just the description.
Follow a dependency, inspect production evidence and challenge a supplier assumption.
Explore Oreline →